A Short letter to a Materialist

A Short letter to a Materialist

  I have often had materialists[1] tell me that” there is nothing in nature that requires a supernatural explanation per say. My reply to that is, I might as well say there is nothing in nature which requires a scientific explanation[2]. Nature has no requirement to understand her.  You can put any  interpretation on her; you wish and she will not protest a bit.  Moreover, who says that everyone must look at nature or anything else through the narrow lens of our present human knowledge and the way some atheistic scientists constructed reality?[3] Their whole narrative is based on the assumption that there is no God, which they cannot prove any more than the theist can prove the existence of God. Both start from an assumption and then build a whole world view around that assumption[4]. One big difference is that the believer can still be open-minded enough to do science in his world view while the atheistic scientists are total blind by their materialism to anything outside of their narrow way of looking at things.

Read very carefully the below quote. It is extremely telling about people assumptions and the power they have over a person and groups of people. You also see there a man who I would say is a true believer in science-ism, although a weak form of it, because he knows much of it is false. However, he does admit that his faith is based upon an assumption that materialism is true.

“Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural.  We take the side of science in  spite of the patent absurdity  of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, to materialism.  It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our   prior adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated.  Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a divine foot in the door.”[5] 

[1] A materialist is a person which believes that everything is made up of matter and denies the existence of spirit. Thus denying the supernatural.

[2] Read my article “Rocks on The Ground” http://wp.me/p5pJxI-lTw  at lyleduell.me

[3] I feel no intellectual compulsion to view all of life from a materialistic point of view. When you force reality into a closed ideological system as materialism you will surely distort reality. I also have chosen not to believe in Materialism for pragmatic reasons and my mind is closed to it. As William James would say “I am dead to it”. There is simply no life in that world view.

[4] If scientists that are believers and scientists that are atheist wish to argue and fight about the existence of God that’s fine but both sides must admit that they are debating as philosophers and not a scientist.

[5] Richard Leonine, “Billions and Billions of Demons”, New York Review of Books 44, no. 1 (January 9,1997) 28-32 . Lewontin teaches biology at Harvard.




Why all the social unrest?

Why all the social unrest?

It’s obvious someone is benefiting from it.  Therefore, to know where it comes from all one has to do is look for the people who are benefiting from it.  Let’s look at two examples of immigration and race.  Who benefits from massive immigration? There are a number of groups but for our purpose we will look at two.  The first of them is the large corporations that need the cheap labor that open borders provide.  This cheap labor keeps wages down and allows the corporations to make more money.  Of course this is done at the expense of the working class. It is simply a matter of supply and demand. The more labor that is available the cheaper it is.  This is especially true in a declining job market as we have here in United States.  This coupled with a system of crony capitalism  where the government works with the corporations to guarantee them cheap labor by keeping the borders open.  Of course, the same effect takes place when you implement so-called free trade laws that benefit corporations when moving out of the country. Most of our free-trade agreements benefit large and middle size corporations that have the power to use the government and the funding to move their companies offshore.  The unbalanced free trade laws do little for the American working class and Small Business.  They’re in place manly to help corporations to make more money.  Free trade is not free; someone pays for it.

Massive immigration also helps the political class that uses minorities as a part of their voting base.  This is simple math.  The more immigrants you bring in the more votes you have in your  voting bloc.  In fact, if you build this block large enough you can control the elections for decades.  This raises the question of why any political party would then try to  improve the economics of their voting bloc if in doing so, they would no longer need the help of that political party thus  eradicate its own voting bloc ?  This may explain the economics stagnation of many of the ethnic groups in our culture i.e. their political party does not want them to succeed economically, for if they do they may leave the party.

Who benefits from massive immigration?  It’s big business, the rich and powerful, that own corporations and the political parties that capture the immigrants as a voting block to strengthen their base.  In this, I find it strange that most working-class people vote for politicians and parties that support one-sided free trade and open borders.  I think the communist Lennon referred to these people as useful idiots.