The Atheistic Criticism of Religion
When an atheist criticizes religion for the most part they are simply criticizing the human condition; which is one of ignorance, sinfulness and hypocrisy. These characteristics can be found in any society, culture and civilization and for that matter in every person. They are found in religious cultures, secular cultures and atheistic cultures. They are common to all men. Pointing these things out in any culture modern or ancient does not take a great deal of intelligence nor understanding. It reflects a pretentious self-righteousness when criticizing others to exalt oneself. Given the same circumstances and conditions most humans will react in similar ways. Much of the criticism of religion by atheism is nothing more than posing self righteous virtue at the best, and total moral egotism at its worst. Their criticism proves nothing other than humanity is ignorant, sinful, hypocritical and poisons everything he touches.
The truth is that atheism as an ideology or as a foundational philosophy for a culture, has demonstrated itself to be totally inadequate to support a virtuous culture any more than religion. In fact, all atheistic cultures have led to totalitarianism and even Europe as it embraces the secular is moving towards totalitarianism. One should be careful in tearing down the poor man’s house unless he has something better to offer.
Moreover, the atheistic criticism of Christianity represents a shallow understanding of the message of Jesus. A casual reading of the New Testament would demonstrate to any rational person that Jesus never intended his teachings to be the foundation of any large society, for his teachings are too demanding for the masses. Yet, many atheists continue to attack the teachings of Western Christianity as though they were the pristine teachings of Jesus; in this they demonstrate their ignorance or their dishonesty. In the majority of cases it is ignorance, at least from my experience most atheists are quite ignorant of Christian theology and often depend on a vulgar interpretation of Christianity to justify their criticism.
Science doesn’t draw conclusions about supernatural explanations Do gods exist? Do supernatural entities intervene in human affairs? These questions may be important, but science won’t help you answer them. Questions that deal with supernatural explanations are, by definition, beyond the realm of nature — and hence, also beyond the realm of what can be studied by science.” Science Dept — University of California at Berkeley
“science describes and explains the natural world: it does not prove or disprove beliefs about the supernatural” — American Anthropological Association
“no aspect of science can address supernatural questions…..supernatural entities by definition operate outside of natural laws and so [truly] cannot be investigated using methods of experimentation” — American Association For the Advancement of Science
“Science is not based on faith, nor does it preclude faith” — American Astronomical Society
” theologians may also be interested in the physical world, but in addition they usually believe in a metaphysical or supernatural realm inhabited by souls, spirits, angels, or gods, and this heaven or nirvana is often believed to be the future resting place of all believers after death. Such supernatural constructions are beyond the scope of science” — National Academy of Sciences
” science is precluded from making statements about supernatural forces because these are outside its provenance.” — National Science Teachers Association
“Explanations employing nonnaturalistic or supernatural events, whether or not explicit reference is made to a supernatural being, are outside the realm of science …. all of science, is necessarily silent on religion and neither refutes nor supports the existence of a deity or deities.” National Association of Biology Teachers
Faith Versus Reason
To have faith is to confess bias. However, all beliefs are grounded and based on faith, at least initially. Our very language supports this, “I believe in reason.” You must have faith in reason before you attempt to use it. In the end there is a faith element in everything we believe and do, it all begins with faith. But, in many cases the faith element is tacit, hidden or so small it remains unnoticed. Sometimes it is referred to by other names such as a hunch, intuition or hypothesis, but however small, it is there. Faith is the beginning of knowledge. The affirmation “I believe” is the beginning of all thought.
Some seem to believe the way to true knowledge is by endless questioning and doubting. However, this is a belief that in itself requires faith. Should we doubt everything except our doubts? Now, do not get me wrong, there is a place in our thought process for doubting, but doubting cannot be the beginning, goal or the end. It must lead to faith, for it is faith that leads to truth and action. For example, the agnostic is frozen between belief and unbelief by their doubting and in turn doubting their doubts, while the atheist believes their doubts, and is going nowhere. On the other hand the theist believes their beliefs and should be open to the future of truth. If skeptical-ism is taken to its logical conclusion it could lead to a stalled intellectual progress and a cynical view of truth and learning. If you question everything in the end you must question your truth and when your truth is overthrown by doubting “the truth” is not far behind and you are close to being thrown into the abyss of relativism.
Some might reply. what about science and the scientific method? Do you not need faith in reason to believe in science and the scientific method? Does not science have to assume (have faith) that nature has her laws for scientist to do science? I believe this is called the uninformed of nature. This belief cannot be proven because to prove it you would have to believe in it to attempt to prove it. This seems to point to the fact that all human knowledge must begin with faith on some ground (foundation) which is also to accept it by faith.
 If skeptical-ism is taken to extremes it can lead to a stalled intellectual progress and a cynical view of learning. There is a tendency for skeptical-ism to lead to radical relativism which guts the meaning of existence and leaves people cynical.
 The scientists claim they test everything by the scientific method. However, the scientific method is based on faith in the uniformity of nature and reason. Some have questioned reasoning but I know of none that have questioned the uniformity of nature, for to do so would be to question the whole enterprise of science.
The Curse Of The Secular
There was a time when Western culture had sacred times, places and men. Now we have the secular and everything has become equal and ordinary. The mystery in the world has been taken out of the holy and sacred, leaving us with nothing but the secular or the profane without mystery and without wonder. This is a huge negative because it’s out of wonder and mystery that the celebration of life comes. We celebrate life because of its mystery. Once the mystery is taken out there is nothing left but hollow and empty dogmas’.
For example, we used to dress up for special occasions, but now we have few special occasions and the ones that we have are empty for most people. Everything, everyone and every place is equal, the special has been overcome by the ordinary. The weak, the insignificant and the small have overcome the big and the powerful. The sacred has been destroyed by the ordinary. The curse of secularism has come upon us. Increasingly our language is becoming profane and secular. Nothing is holy, nothing is sacred, all words are profane, which in the end means nothing is important or special because everything is equal. Good is evil and evil is good. Nothing is sacred, all is profane.
Some would say that science has done this but that’s not the case, what really has done it is the ego of man who has made himself larger, and God small, to the point that God has been eliminated from the world of us men. In contrast, true science has proven that the creation is infinitely big and infinitely small beyond the imagination of man. The problem is that science, like religion, has been over powered by the profane and has become secularized. Remember, that early scientist’s were some of the greatest men of faith. Their science was a wellspring of wonder and amazement at the creation of God. Their science came out of wonder, today the science of the secular comes out of doubting. It was not science, that emptied science of faith, but rather it was the secular and profane thinking of the enlightenment which profaned science and culture, and even religion.
It is surprising that atheism and Christianity has one thing in common, both equalize everything. Atheism does it by making everything equally profane and Christianity does it by making everything sacred. Christianity, if I understand it correctly makes everything sacred. All men are sacred, all places are sacred, all truth is sacred and all time is sacred. Therefore, Christianity is a positive force in the world exulting all things to a higher level where unbelief is a negative force reducing everything to the profane, even human life.
If I am correct the secular world is, and will, pay a terrible price for their belief system of the secular. We can begin to see some of the consequences of the secular mind in the atheistic systems of communism and socialism. But the horrors have just begun. The profaning of sexuality, marriage and the family will usher in the complete collapse of civilization as we know it today. It will reduce everything to the level of beasts seeking the lowest common denominator. Secularism is man’s attempt to return to all fours.