The Death of Religion
The Christ event, the death and resurrection of Christ, symbolizes many things like the end of the old order and the beginning of the new “It represented a new way of approaching God and a new and better covenant. However, many fail to see that the first part the equation, the death of Christ marked the end of religion as a way to approach God. So, we could say that when Christ died, all religion died with him, along with all of its idols.” In view of this statement, I thought it good to give the readers a working definition of what we mean by religion.
The most common idea that comes to mind when we hear the word religion is one of ceremonial and other worldliness. However, when we look deeper we begin to see a sense of religion in just about everything we humans say and do. We see it in our devotion and ceremonialism in regards to our professionalism and nationalism. Robert D. Brinsnead goes so far as to say, “To be a person is to be religious, because a person is by nature homo religious.” One man said, “that a man’s religion is his ultimate concern” and we all have an ultimate concern.
We can also understand the word religion in a narrow sense to mean an institution that forms the foundation of a society and gives it the moral fabric that holds it together. Religion as an institution can be created by humans as in the case of the world’s great religions like Buddhism, Islam, and modern Christianity, or it can be a divinely created religion like ancient Judaism or primitive Christianity. It can be organized like the great religions around the world, or unorganized like American civil religion or New-Age religion. It may even take the form of non-religion like atheistic communism, which itself has become a religion. It is religion in the form of institution that we will be discussing in this article.
From the above we can gather that we can never be completely free from religion in its broadest sense and probably not in any sense of the word. However, we can strive to be free of bad religion in every sense of the word. We might say that anything we do or say that does not lead to life is bad religion.
If you didn’t notice, let me draw your attention to the fact that in talking about religion I did not classify primitive Christianity as a religion. I did this for the simple reason that it is not a religion but rather a way of life. Jesus Christ never founded an organized religion nor did he intend his followers to fabricate one. In fact, Jesus’ intent was to destroy religion as a mediator between God and man. Therefore, primitive Christianity in the first century, like its Lord, stood against all institutionalized religion. It called upon all men everywhere to cease building the institutions of religion, which is a call for man to stop making idols and to start having a living relationship with God through Jesus Christ. The command of God in the gospel is that all men must come out of religion into his Son (II Cor 6:14-18). This calling out of religion includes modern Christianity, which is a total subversion of primitive Christianity.
In order to understand the degree of this subversion, we must further understand the contrast between modern Christianity and primitive Christianity, the latter we will refer to from now on as the Faith. We will see from this contrast that the Faith was subversive to all religion and that modem Christianity is nothing more than a total perversion of the true Faith, which we will see has very little in common with religion in any of its form or institutions.
As we begin to observe organized religion, you will begin to see a common thread that runs through all religion. That thread is that religion is the mediator between man and his absolute. In some cases, this absolute is God, in others it is an idol. An idol is anything made by man and exalted by man as his absolute. This would include ideologies and theological belief systems that have been created to serve him in his understanding of God and reality. Given time these systems usually are exalted to be absolutes. When this happens they become idols and men soon found that these systems of belief that were intended to serve and liberate them, have in fact enslaved them. The religious traditions and institutions that he has made to serve him by giving structure and form have become his master. A modem example of this enslavement to an ideology is Marxism. First, you have the ideology that was meant to enrich mankind. Then you have the subversion of it by the followers of the founder. Then you have the institution that enslaves while claiming to be the perfection of the ideas of its founder.
This subversion and movement away from the founders intentions can be seen equally well in the Christian movement. The Christian church in its institutional form has watered down and has even subverted the teachings of its Lord to make them and itself acceptable to the masses. This perversion is often done under the cloak of evangelism and the love of souls. However, the truth about of the matter is that the institutionalized church loves numbers because it loves power and the status of the numbers.
Subsequently, in order to protect and propagate itself, the institution must also exalt itself to a place of being the sole mediator between its members and their absolute. It usually also claims the right to invest the authority of mediation on certain sacred people, places, codes, and times. Thus we have the creation of the distinction between the sacred and the profane. As long as the institution has control over the sacred, it has a tremendous power over its followers. It is in this area of distinction between the sacred and the profane that primitive Christianity became hostile to all religion. For it proclaimed that in the resurrection of Christ, that God had declared all things clean or sacred, for He is the Lord of all things and all people. In this act of raising his Son, he forever abolished the distinction between the sacred and profane. Therefore, this act of God is also the abolition of all religion, which raises the question; can one believe in the resurrected Christ and religion at the same time?
We have already made the statement that religion mediates though the channels of sacred people (priests or clergymen), sacred places (temples, shrines, etc.), sacred laws (creeds, theological systems, laws, etc.) sacred times (Sabbath day, Sunday, etc.). However, when we look at primitive Christianity we see an amazing absence of these sacred mediators. Instead, we find that there is only one mediator between God and man, and that one mediator is not a religion nor any of its forms of mediation, but rather a man. “There is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all men. The testimony given in its proper time” (1 Tim 2:5,6). If we build on this teaching of the apostle Paul, we must conclude that when Jesus Christ appeared, all religion ceased to mediate the presence of God. In other words, when Jesus came to life, all institutionalized religion was put to death along with all its forms of mediation. At least in the mind of God.
It was religion and its laws that judged Jesus to be the accursed one, but God reversed that judgment by raising him from the dead and declaring him to be the just one. In justifying Jesus in this mighty act of raising him from the dead, God condemned to death all religion, placing it in the old order of things that was done away with through Christ (John 19:7, Col. 2:13-17). He also shows in this act that the real intent and purpose of the Law (religion) was to point people toward Christ and to bring them to faith in the perfect revelation of God which is Jesus Christ (John 1:17, Gal 3:23-25). In restoring Law [religion] to its proper place and fulfilling it by his very presence, Jesus dismantled one of the main forms of mediation of religion. In religion law rules as the absolute. In the Faith it is the living Christ that rules and we could go so far as to say that his standard of rule is not a written code but rather the well-being of man (Mark 2:27). When God raised Jesus from the dead and enthroned him at his right hand, He dethroned all religion. The living Christ has replaced all religion (a system of law or theology). To be involved in making new laws, religions, or systems of theology, is to stand opposed to the living Christ.
Moreover, where institutionalized religion rules there must also be a sacred group of people to teach and enforce the law, for the profane or common people as defined by religion, have no right to handle the sacred law. Thus we have the need for the professional clergy that is set apart for the sacred. However, when we look at primitive Christianity we find no evidence of a professional clergy that was set apart from other members of the community of Faith. In fact, we find evidence that would contradict and even condemn any professionalization or sacralization of any group in the Christian movement. The message we find in the New Testament is that in Jesus Christ all men are equal and have equal access to God through the one mediator, Jesus Christ. Therefore, the apostle Peter could refer to all believers as priests of God (I Peter 2:9).
In the act of making all believers priests, God has forever done away with a separate or professional priesthood or clergy system. In his book entitled “The Church” the Catholic theologian Hans Kung says, “all human priesthood has been fulfilled and finished by the unequal final, unrepeatable and hence unlimited sacrifice of the one continuing eternal high priest. The perfect self-offering sacrifice replaces all cultic sacrifices offered by men; the perfect priest replaces all human priests” (page 469). In commenting on 1 Peter 2:4, Kung says, “the word ‘priest’ ” occurs again here, not used in the sense of an official priesthood, and not in reference to the one high priest Christ, but applied through him and in him to all believers. The WHOLE people, filled by the Spirit of Christ, becomes a priesthood set apart; all Christians are “priests” (page 475). In making all Christians priests, God has made them equal and has forever destroyed the religious concept of mediation through sacred groups of men or women. In this we again see a marked distinction between religion that promotes a sacred group of men and primitive Christianity that makes all men equal before God.
Religion tells us the temple or Holy Place is the place where man will find and worship God. In religion the temple or shrine is the symbol of the presence of God. However, when we turn to the New Testament, we find the very opposite message. In fact, the first Christian martyr, Stephen, was killed for telling religious people that God does not dwell in earthly dwellings made by man (Acts 7:48). The apostle Paul proclaimed the same message when he visited Athens. “The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples (church buildings) built by hands” (Acts 17:24).
In His polemics with the Pharisees, Jesus contrasted the physical temple in Jerusalem with his own body. In this, he was claiming to be the new temple of God. No longer would men find God in earthly temples made out of brick and mortar, but now they would find him in a person. As God dwelled in the physical body of Jesus, He now dwells in the spiritual body of Jesus, which is made up of all that believe in Jesus as their Lord (II Cor 6:16). This group of people is referred to in scripture as the church. In the Bible the word church is used to denote a people, never a building. This is why the apostle Paul could refer to the church as the new temple of God in the new order. From this it becomes obvious that the only place that God dwells in all of creation, is in the only thing that was created in his image, that is man. God dwells in our brother and only in our brother. Therefore mankind and only mankind is sacred. What we do to our fellow man therefore, we are actually doing to God. This is why Christians put such a high importance on human life. This is why we must go to the aid of our brother; for helping our brother is helping God (Matt 25:26). We that are brothers in Christ should remember this teaching when we begin to tear each other apart in the name of truth. What truth is more important than our brother?
We also see in religion an emphasis on sacred times. Both in Judaism and paganism we find a distinct separation between the sacred and the profane in regards to time. In paganism, the times vary greatly. In Judaism, we find the Sabbath day or the seventh day set apart with a number of additional feast days as the sacred times for the Jewish people. However, when we turn to the New Testament, we find the distinction between times abolished in Christ. In the new order in Christ, all time becomes sacred because it all belongs to Christ. For he is the creator and Lord of all time (Col 1:15-18).
The apostle Paul in writing to Gentile Christians that had been converted out of paganism, exhorted them not to go back to religion by observing special times and days. “Formerly, when you did not know God, you were slaves to those who by nature are not Gods. But now that you know God or rather are known by God how is it that you are turning back to those weak and miserable principles? Do you wish to be enslaved by them all over again? You are observing special days and months and seasons and years! I fear for you, that somehow I have wasted my efforts on you” (Gal 4:8-11). He goes on to say, “therefore, do not let anyone judge you by what you eat, drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a new moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.” (Col 2:16-17) Some have misunderstood this passage thinking that Paul was saying that the reality behind the Sabbath was Sunday. However when we look at the passage in its context we quickly see that the reality behind the Sabbath was not just another or different sacred day, but rather the person of Christ himself. It is Christ that is the final and perfect rest for the people of God. (Heb 3:7-11).
By Through Christ, God has made all times sacred by entering into ALL of time in the person of His son Jesus. In everything that Jesus did, he did it to the glory of God. Therefore, everything he did was worship to the Father. In this, Jesus demonstrated that God is present in all times and activities. For in Jesus (God with us), God has entered into the very times and activities where Christ was involved. In this God was telling us that the everyday and ordinary has become sacred. Therefore, Christians no longer worship God at a particular time or place, for they worship him at all times in everything they do (Col 3:17). This also means that our work, play and even our rest is worship to the Father, for we see Jesus involved in all of these things making them acceptable to the Father. Christians do not come together to worship God in the traditional sense but rather to encourage and to exhort one another unto good works, which is worship in its true sense (Heb 10:24-25). The good works that we do outside of our meetings are the highest form of worship for the spiritually mature. Putting the emphasis on coming together to worship God in a sacred place at a sacred time is a digression back to religion and a movement away from God. Note Herman Ridderbos, “Paul: An Outline of His Theology” (Page 481).
The modern church’s emphasis on corporate worship with its ritual, form, and structure is a move back to religion and an effort to take God out of the everyday or ordinary and place him back into the sacred. Great attention is given to create the atmosphere that will give the worshiper the sense of the presence of God. This sends the message that God is somehow more present in this religious atmosphere than in the nonreligious everyday. It matters little whether the religious atmosphere is created by icons, ritual, esthetics or emotionalism; it all represents a return to religion. When religion does this, it presents God as the totally other, that is, totally removed from the everyday, a God that must be approached through sacred people and sacred places. However, in the New Testament we see a very human God that draws close to man in the everyday. A God who has come among his people in the form of a man. A God to whom all have equal access. A God that is near and can be called on in any place and at any time. A God that has hallowed the everyday with his presence.
Moreover, religion makes worship something you do in a sacred place and is directed toward God. In contrast, when we look at the Faith, we find that worship is something you do in the everyday and is directed toward God through your fellow man. “And do not forget to do good and to share with others, for with such sacrifices God is pleased.” (Heb 13:16) “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” (James 1:27) From this we can gather that true religion and true worship is something that is done in the everyday and has very little, if anything, to do with what the modern church calls worship. True worship is loving your brother and sharing the message of God’s love with your neighbor.
From all this, we can conclude that religion, instead of bringing or drawing us closer to God, actually distances us from God. But if this is the case, how do we explain this phenomenon? How could a faith that started out as a simple way of life turn into a religion? How could God be taken out of the ordinary and placed back into the sacred? The answer is that the Christian faith was subverted by religion and human wisdom. The tracing of the evolution of this subversion is beyond the scope of this article. However, for those who would like a complete treatment of this subversion, I recommend “The Distancing of God” by Bernard J. Cooke and “The Subversion of Christianity” by Jacques Ellule. These two books will forever change the way you look upon the Christian religion.
 This article may help some to see that religion and faith in God are not the same. A person can question religion without questing the existence of God. In like manner, a person can believe in Jesus Christ and yet reject many aspects of the Christian religion.
 Some of the new atheist type have postulated that religion has nothing to do with shaping the morality of a culture. This position is so ridiculous that it’s not worth commenting on.
 These idols can consist of ideologies, pseudo-religions like scientism and political ideologies like nationalism, etc.
 Hans Kung