The Darwinian Evolution Narrative
The more I read on evolution the more I have come to realize that the theory of Darwinian Evolution is based more on narrative than facts. By this I mean that it is based on a well thought out story without a lot of real facts to back it up. Most often it is based on conjecture or outright fiction. I also have noticed that the facts are often made to fit the story instead of the story fitting the facts.
How could this happen? How could so many intelligent people embrace such a theory as fact? There are three answers to this question. The first one is that they have accepted the scientific maxim or dogma that everything must be explained naturalistically, leaving no other possible explanation, except maybe for the seeding of the earth by alien life forces. This dogma also hinders any real attempt by those inside the system to attempt to disprove the theory. The second is the failure to see that the theory is not the facts. Some confuse the map for the territory. The third is that many in the educated class had accept science as a new faith. Some have gone so far as to give it a name, it’s called scientism; the belief that only true knowledge must come through science. Well this may make Johnny a real brilliant boy but it also makes him a very narrow-minded boy.
Evolution in its most basic form is a fact. Life changes and adapts to its environment. We can see this happening in the barnyard and sometimes it is aided and directed by man (consciousness). However, Darwin’s theory of evolution is not a fact, it is an interpretation of the facts, with the interpretation of the facts being dependent on the narrative and there is no narrative without a secular or atheist world view. Historical fact verifies that the materialistic worldview came first, then the narrative and then the theory. It is a well-known fact that Darwin and others in his time believed in the theory of evolution before there were any scientific facts to support it. This simply means that it would be very easy for this theory to have a social origin.
Evolutionist’s are constantly asking the question what narrative best fits the facts? By this they’re usually talking about a theological narrative that they suppose existed. However the truth is there is no theological narrative as to how God made the world. The Bible simply states that God did it and any good theologian would never suppose or assert that they were capable of explaining how God created the world. They clearly understand that such an event could only be spoken about metaphorically in story, poetry and myth. Theologians understand the difference between truth, and the truth. Theology leaves room for mystery and science leaves none. For that reason, science has the tendency to fill the gap’s with narrative and speculation, which it then attempts to falsify. At least that is what it claims to do and should do.
In this, the Darwinian theory of evolution is a theory of necessity for those accepting a materialistic or atheistic worldview. The only alternatives would be for them to just simply say they don’t know. Unfortunately, the majority are not willing to do that or even try to base their study and research on an attempt to figure out how consciousness created all things. In most cases this is because they have a prior commitment to materialism, like Johnny, they have become small-minded. It should also be noted that because of their prior commitment to materialism it would be very difficult to attempt to falsify a theory which you have already committed to as the only one possible.
However, this insight has not led me to any expectation on my part that the theory will be overthrown sometime in the near future. The Theory itself has evolved into a secular myth that supports a secular world view. The science has ended, religious faith has taken its place.
 I find it strange that people can accept that man can direct evolution and at the same time hold to the belief that a God could not do it.
 “The Road of Science and The Ways to God” By Stanley L. Jaki Page 282